Waldemar, Watts, Obama and Hope

"Hope" by G. F. Watts

"Hope" by G. F. Watts

I like to read the Sunday Times, but we have to go out on Sunday morning to buy it because newspaper delivery doesn’t work here the way it does in the USA.  Recently, a local weekly called to ask whether we would like to take part in “a new scheme” they were “trialing”, in which the newspaper company would hire kids on bikes to go around the neighborhoods, delivering newspapers to customers’ doors.  What a brave new concept! They “trialed” that for the first time in New York City only a few years ago.  In 1833, according to Wikipedia.  Alas, here on the Surrey-Hampshire border, it didn’t catch on. 

Here, you have to make an arrangement with a newsagent – another one of those English words that made life here seem so exotic when I read about it in English books.  People who live in England have agents to procure their newspapers and magazines? How posh is that?  Not posh at all, it turns out.  A newsagent is just the keeper of a little shop that sells newspapers and magazines (and usually some candy bars or possibly real groceries, as well).  Since we live 100 yards past the limit of the nearest newsagent’s delivery area, we’re out of luck. 

So every Sunday we go out to get the paper, mainly for the columnists and critics because we get the news from BBC Radio 4 and the internet every day.  And one of our favorite writers in the Sunday Times is the art critic, Waldemar Januszczak.  We refer to him as Waldemar (“Did you read what Waldemar said about…?”) not because we can’t pronounce his surname, but because it’s easy to feel we know him.  His writing on art is enthusiastic, refreshing, and totally lacking in fashionable or pretentious art-speak.  But Waldemar hates George Frederic Watts. 

Watts was a Victorian painter who lived at Compton, a little Surrey village about five miles from where I sit as I’m typing this. We usually take out-of-town visitors to the  gallery there, which the artist left to the public. Enormous, wall-sized canvasses illustrate scenes from myth or literature, expose the plight of the downtrodden of Victorian England, or show allegories of ideas: time, destiny, love, progress—or hope. It was Watts’s painting, Hope, that inspired a Dr Frederick G. Sampson of Virginia to give a lecture, which prompted Rev. Jeremiah Wright to give his 1990 sermon “The Audacity to Hope”, which in turn so moved Obama.  Watts’s Hope is reported to be Obama’s favorite painting. 

"Sower of the Systems" by G. F. Watts

"Sower of the Systems" by G. F. Watts

My husband hates the painting.  He prefers Tasting the First Oyster BC, Watts’s comical image of an Adam-and-Eve style couple on the beach, a little bit of whimsy (though a large canvas) in which BC has been said to stand for Before Clothes.  The man holding the oyster looks dubious, and the woman’s obviously saying “You aren’t actually thinking of eating that thing, are you?”  Lest you think my other half is a Philistine, let me add that his favorite Watts image (and mine) is The Sower of the Systems, a composition of blue and golden swirls that invites you to see a creator scattering stars like seeds. 

In any case, his complaint is that Watt’s Hope is too dejected, is utterly hopeless.  Waldemar, too, says it’s a painting about hopelessness.  But that’s the point; hope is in the one remaining string on the figure’s lyre, the one chance left in a scene that is otherwise absolutely bleak.

 Watts painted a lot of bleakness.  Waldemar called Watts’s Time, Death and Judgment one of the painter’s “doomiest allegories”, implying that Watts painted lots of doom-laden pictures, which he did.  The only thing Waldemar likes less than Time, Death and Judgment, which used to hang in St Paul’s Cathedral, is the modernist work that replaced it. And now, with the Watts Gallery closed for the first refurbishment in 100 years, the painting is, he tells us, “back on temporary loan to the cathedral, alongside another gloomy wrist-slitter featuring a zombie mother and her baby.”  That’s our Waldemar!  And that’s our Watts, too, although he also produced Symbolist works that blaze with yellow and gold and white, as far from gloom as you can imagine. 

While the gallery is closed, Watts’s paintings are on loan and can be at seen at lots of venues by people who might not ordinarily get to museums or galleries.  Watts would have liked that, being something of a Socialist.  His Socialist sympathies led Watts to refuse a baronetcy offered by Queen Victoria (twice), and led his wife to open a terra cotta pottery to provide workers an alternative to life as, in effect, serfs tied to local landowners.   

(I hope I’m not doing a disservice to Mr. Obama to draw people’s attention to a connection between the president and Watts, because Obama is not a Socialist.  British people absolutely hoot at reports that some US politicians or newspapers say Obama is a Socialist—well, those who aren’t too polite to hoot.  The polite ones merely raise an eyebrow and remark that Americans must not know what a Socialist is if they think Obama qualifies.) 

Right now, the gallery is using the image of Hope as the logo for the campaign to raise funds for the renovations.  There’s more information at http://www.wattsgallery.org.uk where, in the British spirit of fair play, they offer a link to Waldemar’s negative article on Watts along with many links to those who admire the work, and an article about why, no matter what you think of the pictures today, Watts’s work is an important part of the history of British art.  

Obama as Hope, by Phil Disley

Obama as Hope, by Phil Disley

The cartoon by Phil Disley, showing Obama as Hope, comes from another British newspaper, The Guardian.  If you like the cartoon, the gallery would be happy to take your order for a print, you can even get one signed by the artist (£25, proceeds to the renovation campaign) — go to http://www.wattsgallery.org.uk/shop_disley.html

It almost goes without saying that I’m looking forward to the reopening of the gallery.  (Maybe Obama will come!  Stranger things have happened.)  It’s rather nice, having a collection of one of the country’s major artists virtually in our back yard/back garden.  But apparently we can’t both have such a gallery nearby and have Sunday papers delivered, drat the luck.

(All images used by permission of the Watts Gallery.)



Filed under Arts, Uncategorized

5 responses to “Waldemar, Watts, Obama and Hope

  1. M.F. Case

    For me, Watts’ image of “Hope” evokes the existence of hope than an absence of hope, (hopelessness).

    Hope remained in Pandora’s box after all sorts of miseries had been allowed to escape. By the time you get to the point where *only* hope is left, you’ve been through a lot and you are experiencing a world of miseries. At a time like that, even though you do still have hope, you might nevertheless be expected to look miserable.

    The Obama Family will be sightseeing this week here in our state, at the Grand Canyon. My husband and I, (see earlier post), *hope* to get a peek at them!

  2. Pingback: Watch This Plinth « M E Foley's Anglo-American Experience Blog

  3. Pingback: Tea, part 3 | M E Foley's Anglo-American Experience Blog

  4. Jerome

    That painting is hilarious. It is a complete mockery of Obama. All of the elements of the original painting that evoke the concept of hope are removed. For example, in the original, there is a single string left on the harp and the figure is bending their ear to listen to it, with their right hand raised to gently pluck it. There is no string in the ‘Bama version, thus making it an image of hopelessness. Obama bends his ear in vain to listen to strings that are not there.


    • Is there some official Obama version of the painting? All I know is the original painting, though I suppose by now people must be printing poster after poster. And can the viewer be certain, if there appears to be no string in the reproduction, the string isn’t just so fine that you can’t see it? The string is hardly detectable in the original, which I think must be part of the point. And if someone alters the image to remove the last string, that certainly doesn’t make the original hilarious; it remains what it is.

      Even so, a bad reproduction isn’t a mockery of Obama, you know. I guess you think there’s no hope for the USA, then. Given the Republican candidates at the moment, I can understand how members of that party would find the situation hopeless, but I think, whichever party wins, the country will muddle through to something positive.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s